Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have no idea if they intent to continue the series or if they just like "screw the players"

I wish we could have see some more of the first 2 games characters.

Just mentions to they names aint enough for me

Yeah... guess it makes sense that they have already done their part to the world, but still : p

 

This makes me remember when I used to play this sort of "old" games with my brother to compete who went faster. Like the first Golden Sun, or Final Fantasy Tactics A. It's quite funny to start a new game with a friend at the same time and comment how is it going to you, who's going faster, who has a better ranked clan, who got the best classes and skills, etc  :lol:

Posted

Yeah... guess it makes sense that they have already done their part to the world, but still : p

 

This makes me remember when I used to play this sort of "old" games with my brother to compete who went faster. Like the first Golden Sun, or Final Fantasy Tactics A. It's quite funny to start a new game with a friend at the same time and comment how is it going to you, who's going faster, who has a better ranked clan, who got the best classes and skills, etc  :lol:

 

True.They job was already done but still,if the old fossil appears in dark dawn why couldnt the others :P

 

I always get carried playing jrpgs so the competition would always give up  :(

Posted

True.They job was already done but still,if the old fossil appears in dark dawn why couldnt the others :P

 

I always get carried playing jrpgs so the competition would always give up  :(

Pffff who's scared of a nubie like you <3

Posted

How dare you?

kobato_puffy_cheeks.gif

 

On that,My number one rule while playing any game is "Dont stop until you have a 100% save file"

Well, we both know I'm the true JRPG leader here, that's why I dare!

 

Mine is: complete the main story, have fun with the rest of the features.

I really hate that since many people love the "I wanna achieve 100% features", many game producers have started making underqualified and short stories in exchnage for many extra side things to do. One good example could be the latest Zelda game, for example. It's SO short, yet they throw those hundreds of collectibles, so that they can still put a "x hours of gameplay" even if it's not true.

Posted

Well, we both know I'm the true JRPG leader here, that's why I dare!

 

Mine is: complete the main story, have fun with the rest of the features.

I really hate that since many people love the "I wanna achieve 100% features", many game producers have started making underqualified and short stories in exchnage for many extra side things to do. One good example could be the latest Zelda game, for example. It's SO short, yet they throw those hundreds of collectibles, so that they can still put a "x hours of gameplay" even if it's not true.

 

Maybe my sentence came out wrong.I dont mean i wanna achive 100% extra features or wathever that is, i just mean i just dont finish the "main story" and drop a game right after.Im really bad at explaining myself  :wacko:

I make sure i explore a game to its full

 

What zelda game is that?I kinda lost myself in the middle of all zelda titles that came out :D

Posted

Maybe my sentence came out wrong.I dont mean i wanna achive 100% extra features or wathever that is, i just mean i just dont finish the "main story" and drop a game right after.Im really bad at explaining myself  :wacko:

 

What zelda game is that?I kinda lost myself in the middle of all zelda titles that came out :D

A Link Between Worlds. It was a sort of remake (but different, more like it was based on it) of an older one, if I remember correctly.

 

The thing is: it got rated really high, between 8 and 9 mostly, yet it was horrid as a JRPG. The difficulty was insulting (I'm the opposite of hardcore when it comes to Zelda games, yet I only died like a couple times in the whole game, and all of those in a zone where you had to "guess" where to jump to, or fall and die to the lava), the story was super obvious and clichéd, and really short. Balanced only with lots of "extra" features like collecting thingies and such.

Posted

A Link Between Worlds. It was a sort of remake (but different, more like it was based on it) of an older one, if I remember correctly.

 

The thing is: it got rated really high, between 8 and 9 mostly, yet it was horrid as a JRPG. The difficulty was insulting (I'm the opposite of hardcore when it comes to Zelda games, yet I only died like a couple times in the whole game, and all of those in a zone where you had to "guess" where to jump to, or fall and die to the lava), the story was super obvious and clichéd, and really short. Balanced only with lots of "extra" features like collecting thingies and such.

 

As far as Zelda games went i only cared about Ocarina of time, Majora mask, Oracle of Seasons and Ages(first zelda games i actually played) and Wind Waker.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...