Guest -Shizuku- Posted June 17, 2015 Posted June 17, 2015 So I was wandering on internet looking for some fun and I actually found some. PETA statement about this seems a bit (bit!) reasonable BUT in my opinion only if we take from people ability to distinguish an actual pet and a character with a trait that is for said animal typical. As my friend said "It is technically true, but people have this wonderful thing called brain and morality." What do you think about this fellow fuwa members ? Does catgirl sexualization indulge and promotes sexual behavior towards actual animals or not? (because I think it's bullshit as big as possible) Quote
havoc Posted June 17, 2015 Posted June 17, 2015 ....... seems like the PETA has a need to visit a brain surgeon and quick, before its to late. Quote
Yuuko Posted June 17, 2015 Posted June 17, 2015 Stuff like that is always bullshit for me but of course still I can't deny that it might affect some people. If I remember right that tweet is also fake but my memory is bad so idk. sanahtlig 1 Quote
Eclipsed Posted June 17, 2015 Posted June 17, 2015 As long as there aren't any spikes in the stats of cat abuse be it physical or sexual that is a direct result of their depiction in Japanese animes I call BS Quote
Shikomizue Posted June 17, 2015 Posted June 17, 2015 I think this is really far-fetched. Only someone who's an idiot or insane would have sex with an animal, much less do so because of anime. Also, they pluralized anime wrong. Quote
Nosebleed Posted June 17, 2015 Posted June 17, 2015 >People's ability to distinguish a pet and a fictional character There are no anthropomorphic creatures in real life... If you actually somehow confuse a real life cat with a catgirl, you have a serious mental disorder and should probably get checked up and I don't think anime can really be the cause for that. ohiowar and Kimossab 2 Quote
atorq Posted June 17, 2015 Posted June 17, 2015 Does catgirl sexualization indulge and promotes sexual behavior towards actual animals or not? (because I think it's bullshit as big as possible) Quote
Narcosis Posted June 17, 2015 Posted June 17, 2015 Stop treating internet seriously. It's bad for your health. Kimossab 1 Quote
sub-zer0 Posted June 17, 2015 Posted June 17, 2015 PETA can't say shit when they are the ones killing animals Quote
BookwormOtaku Posted June 17, 2015 Posted June 17, 2015 Normally I'd link to a certain Penn and Teller episode but since it's only legally available on Hulu Plus... I'll go with this instead: 12kami 1 Quote
Kaguya Posted June 17, 2015 Posted June 17, 2015 Normally I'd link to a certain Penn and Teller episode but since it's only legally available on Hulu Plus... I'll go with this instead: God damn it, you beat me to it. BookwormOtaku 1 Quote
Guest -Shizuku- Posted June 17, 2015 Posted June 17, 2015 Things like this are outrageous and comes of simple boredome, some people doesn't have anything to do with their lifes so they come up with those Quote
Bolverk Posted June 17, 2015 Posted June 17, 2015 I love humanity. Zodai, BookwormOtaku and Tyrael 3 Quote
Chronopolis Posted June 17, 2015 Posted June 17, 2015 Even if you subtract our biased viewpoint, PETA is really full of shit and should not be expected to say anything meaningful. I think the somewhat more valid concern is the portrayal of women...But wtf, it's just a matter of plz seperate reality and games. Quote
Flutterz Posted June 17, 2015 Posted June 17, 2015 Wow, PETA are so racist. Who says catgirls can't consent? Quote
Getsuya Posted June 17, 2015 Posted June 17, 2015 Wasn't there an anime/hentai where the main character saw all cats as human beings but nobody else did? Or am I thinking of the Moemon comic some guy wrote... Quote
SoulJustIn Posted June 17, 2015 Posted June 17, 2015 seriously? The PETA very amazing. It didn't occur me even once about abusing animal is coming from Japanese anime Cat girl (promoting)...... (I wonder how/what make the person think that ) btw, why only cat girl? what about bunny girl? didn't apply? Quote
Darklord Rooke Posted June 17, 2015 Posted June 17, 2015 @Flutterz: I would just leave it as “prejudiced.” Or "discriminatory." Race is a word referring to the different categories of human-kind, and hybrids have always been treated as a different species (e.g. for example mules, or ligers [which are cool.]) There IS such a word as "speciesist" but I don't think the definition is what you want. Quote
Flutterz Posted June 17, 2015 Posted June 17, 2015 I suppose, but at the same time race 1. A group of people identified as distinct from other groups because of supposed physical or genetic traits shared by the group. Most biologists and anthropologists do not recognize race as a biologically valid classification, in part because there is more genetic variation within groups than between them. And despite being hybrids I think they fit the definition of a group of people that are distinct because of physical or genetic traits. Quote
Nimbus Posted June 17, 2015 Posted June 17, 2015 Dear PETA People who live in glass houses should probably stop killing and abusing real animals. Sincerely Cat-girl Lovers Everywhere. BookwormOtaku and Zodai 2 Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.