Mr Poltroon Posted June 23, 2015 Posted June 23, 2015 PS: Got bored making this and fiddled with a couple of people's usernames for kicks. I doubt anyone will notice though. Unfortunately for you, when one says "fiddle with someone's name" the first place they look is mine, and they are usually right. You dastardly fiend. Quote
Nayleen Posted June 23, 2015 Posted June 23, 2015 But since you're crawling you should already have Information like thread ID (it's in the URL), post ID (linked in the upper right corner of each post) and user ID anyways, so dumping by that info shouldn't be an issue. Quote
Flutterz Posted June 23, 2015 Author Posted June 23, 2015 But since you're crawling you should already have Information like thread ID (it's in the URL), post ID (linked in the upper right corner of each post) and user ID anyways, so dumping by that info shouldn't be an issue. I'm lazy and I didn't save the full data I got, just the stuff I wanted. But yeah, it's not particularly hard to get the thread ID, and the rest of the stuff I already have. Quote
OriginalRen Posted June 23, 2015 Posted June 23, 2015 I'm going to steal your fun and do this before you Fufufufufufu. Â Incoming edits when I finish. Â Average number of likes per liked post: 1.543 Â Most liked people: Nosebleed: 2470 OriginalRen: 1173 Flutterz: 1125 SolidBatman: 956 Ouraibaa-Hjyuraa: 942 Tay: 849 (only included because its Tay) Most generous likers: Stray Cat: 1013 Eclipsed: 864 Tiago: 854 LiquidShu: 804 Krill: 755 Tay: 656 (Surprisingly only included because its Tay) Like Karma: Likes Given - Likes Received, a measure of who whores the most likes if you will. Like Karma, Top 5: LiquidShu: +684 Krill: +539 Suzu Fanatic: +320 Silvz: +316 Stray Cat: +315 Like Karma, Bottom 5: Nosebleed -2252 Original Ren: -945 Ouraibaa: -884 Flutterz: -832 Down: -523 From this point on, Nosebleed becomes a massive outlier, so he got removed from all the charts, otherwise they would be kind of silly. Â Likes Given vs Likes received: and now on a log scale which sort of cleans things up a bit, as they tend to do with erratic data sets: Â Â Likes per day: Someone else can find the retention rate of users and compare it to this, this data set and excel makes it a pain to find them. Â Like it makes my head hurt trying to even come up with an efficient way to sort through this data to do it. Â The bold text is all that matters: Â On your face solidbatman! Â 12kami, Zodai, LinovaA and 3 others 6 Quote
LinovaA Posted June 23, 2015 Posted June 23, 2015 Incoming severely unorganized data: Â I'm too lazy to go and put together anything else. Fiddle and rainsismyfav 2 Quote
Zakamutt Posted June 23, 2015 Posted June 23, 2015 The horror when Tiago, known anti-fun person, has liked more posts than you. Quote
Mr Poltroon Posted June 23, 2015 Posted June 23, 2015 The horror when Tiago, known anti-fun person, has liked more posts than you. You should know I am incredibly liberal with my likes. Note that this is an attempt at making people more comfortable and remind them that the like system exists. Ultimately, it is all a plot to increase the likes I obtain. Kimossab 1 Quote
arakura Posted June 23, 2015 Posted June 23, 2015 This is really cool, thanks Flutterz. Now to peruse the data for myself! Quote
rainsismyfav Posted June 23, 2015 Posted June 23, 2015 So far my stats look quite uninteresting. I'll see about making my personal pie-chart later when I get home from work.~ I'm going to do others' who I'm interested in as well (in my own secrecy) hehe. Â Edit: Nevermind. They are surprisingly interesting Quote
Flutterz Posted June 23, 2015 Author Posted June 23, 2015 Okay, so I had to write a separate program to do this because it was easier than figuring out how to do it in a spreadsheet, but here are some stats about "like pairs" Most likes given Liker, likee, number of likes given 1292-lewycool, 343-emi, 199 1165-kaguya, 1165-kaguya, 124 8503-eclipsed, 2063-nosebleed, 115 5338-nahichun, 2302-ouraibaa-hjyuraa, 93 7313-stray-cat, 2063-nosebleed, 88 12010-saintofvoid, 10269-xreaper, 87 7101-liquidshu, 2063-nosebleed, 74 8503-eclipsed, 4522-ceris, 71 6569-monmon, 7184-hmn, 68 1310-zenophilious, 2196-flutterz, 65  Most mutually beneficial relationships Liker 1, liker 2, number of likes given in both directions 1292-lewycool, 343-emi, 208 7184-hmn, 6569-monmon, 125 1165-kaguya, 1165-kaguya, 124 8503-eclipsed, 2063-nosebleed, 115 5338-nahichun, 2302-ouraibaa-hjyuraa, 97 7313-stray-cat, 2063-nosebleed, 91 12010-saintofvoid, 10269-xreaper, 89 4522-ceris, 8503-eclipsed, 89 221-tay, 1500-rooke, 84 695-solidbatman, 343-emi, 83  Least noticed by their senpai Liker 1, liker 2, the difference between the likes given "liker 1->liker 2" and "liker 2->liker 1" 1292-lewycool, 343-emi, 190 8503-eclipsed, 2063-nosebleed, 115 5338-nahichun, 2302-ouraibaa-hjyuraa, 89 7313-stray-cat, 2063-nosebleed, 85 12010-saintofvoid, 10269-xreaper, 85 7101-liquidshu, 2063-nosebleed, 74 9913-tyrael, 2063-nosebleed, 63 3519-krill, 2063-nosebleed, 61 5935-aldred, 440-astro, 57 1310-zenophilious, 2196-flutterz, 55  Senpai noticed me (a little) Liker 1, liker 2, liker 1->liker 2(str), liker 2->liker 1(rev), str-rev/max(str,rev) (basically what percentage of the likes in both directions the person that gave more likes has, with all the 100%'s removed, the higher the percentage the more one-sided the likes are) 3519-krill, 2063-nosebleed, 62, 1, 98.39% 5935-aldred, 440-astro, 58, 1, 98.28% 5854-tiagofvarela, 2063-nosebleed, 49, 1, 97.96% 6256-funyarinpa, 2063-nosebleed, 44, 1, 97.73% 4522-ceris, 2063-nosebleed, 44, 1, 97.73% 12010-saintofvoid, 10269-xreaper, 87, 2, 97.70% 6887-rose, 2063-nosebleed, 37, 1, 97.30% 1500-rooke, 2063-nosebleed, 33, 1, 96.97% 7101-liquidshu, 2196-flutterz, 32, 1, 96.88% 7313-stray-cat, 2063-nosebleed, 88, 3, 96.59%  Equivalent exchange Same fields as last time, but limited to those who have at least 30 likes in both directions and sorted in reverse, to find the pairs with the most similar number of likes given 2196-flutterz, 5213-originalren, 17, 17, 0.00% 8503-eclipsed, 221-tay, 19, 18, 5.26% 6569-monmon, 7607-cofee, 17, 16,  5.88% 7156-palas, 1500-rooke, 16, 15, 6.25% 6569-monmon, 7184-hmn, 68, 57, 16.18% 7313-stray-cat, 10870-linovaa, 18, 15, 16.67% 221-tay, 2196-flutterz, 18, 15, 16.67% 8503-eclipsed, 8659-texasdice, 17, 14, 17.65% 7156-palas, 2726-helvetica-standard, 20, 16, 20.00% 2063-nosebleed, 2196-flutterz, 19, 15, 21.05% Eclipsed, Down, LinovaA and 1 other 4 Quote
Eclipsed Posted June 23, 2015 Posted June 23, 2015 ^As promised, I have given you your Like. twice since the most recent post is in the OP as well.  ~~ Least noticed by their senpai Liker 1, liker 2, the difference between the likes given "liker 1->liker 2" and "liker 2->liker 1"  1292-lewycool, 343-emi, 190 8503-eclipsed, 2063-nosebleed, 115 5338-nahichun, 2302-ouraibaa-hjyuraa, 89 7313-stray-cat, 2063-nosebleed, 85 12010-saintofvoid, 10269-xreaper, 85 7101-liquidshu, 2063-nosebleed, 74 9913-tyrael, 2063-nosebleed, 63 3519-krill, 2063-nosebleed, 61 5935-aldred, 440-astro, 57 1310-zenophilious, 2196-flutterz, 55  Well, shit...Definitely boycotting NB from now on  and d'awww @ lewy+emi Quote
Nayleen Posted June 23, 2015 Posted June 23, 2015 If this wasn't entirely useless to the site goals I SO would make this using our database instead of crawling... but damn those statistics. Â Most likes given... 1165-kaguya, 1165-kaguya, 124 Most mutually beneficial relationships ... 1165-kaguya, 1165-kaguya, 124 Pure. Fucking. Gold. I died. Quote
Zalor Posted June 24, 2015 Posted June 24, 2015  We've all had someone "like" one of our posts, but have you ever wondered if anyone has ever, like, like-like "liked" your post? I've stared at this sentence for at least a minute now, and I still don't understand what you are asking.   "Like" inflation is totally a thing. I remember when I was first active here during the spring and summer of 2013 and people hardly ever "liked" anything. That just wasn't a thing back then. Maybe if you helped a mod or an admin when they requested for something, but that was about it. The only way to communicate if you liked what somebody said was by replying to their post. Other wise you had no idea whether people really cared about what you said.  I went on basically a year long hiatus after that and returned during summer of 2014, and suddenly people were actually "liking" things. And I discovered this related to the Fuwa reputation thing. When I returned my reputation was really really low compared to newer users. Simply because the newer users joined at a time when "liking" was something actually done. Somehow I climbed my way up to the "FuwaAwesome" status with over 200 likes. That certainly was a journey.   Quote
Nosebleed Posted June 24, 2015 Posted June 24, 2015 I thought I had the image of a really cool senpai to uphold so. Quote
Flutterz Posted June 24, 2015 Author Posted June 24, 2015 If this wasn't entirely useless to the site goals I SO would make this using our database instead of crawling... but damn those statistics. Where's the fun in doing things the boring way?   Pure. Fucking. Gold. I died. He was also initially in the "Least noticed by their senpai" list, but I removed him since he was only there because I didn't bother to make a separate case for when both the liker and the likee are the same person. The program thought that Kaguya gave Kaguya 124 likes, but Kaguya gave Kaguya 0 likes, making the difference 124, which isn't entirely correct.   I've stared at this sentence for at least a minute now, and I still don't understand what you are asking. "Has anyone, like(interjection), like-like (really like/love) "liked" your post?" "Has anyone "liked" your post because they really like/love you?" Quote
rainsismyfav Posted June 24, 2015 Posted June 24, 2015 Doing my personal analysis now; what is the 2nd column about? most of the numbers are 1 and 2. Â Is that post number? Quote
Zodai Posted June 24, 2015 Posted June 24, 2015 "Has anyone, like(interjection), like-like (really like/love) "liked" your post?""Has anyone "liked" your post because they really like/love you?" Â Personally likes are more attributed towards the quality of the post themselves - I'm more likely to like something by a good friend/someone I'm attracted to, but rarely are those emotions the only factor in liking a post or not. Quote
Flutterz Posted June 24, 2015 Author Posted June 24, 2015 Doing my personal analysis now; what is the 2nd column about? most of the numbers are 1 and 2. It's the like's ID within the post. If a post has 1 like the like will have an ID of 1, if it has 2 likes their IDs will be 1 and 2, etc. Personally likes are more attributed towards the quality of the post themselves - I'm more likely to like something by a good friend/someone I'm attracted to, but rarely are those emotions the only factor in liking a post or not. Don't read too much into it, I was just trying to use the word "like" as many times in a row as possible. Although that's exactly what I was talking about, you're more likely to "like" a post by someone you like, whatever kind of like it may be, which becomes visible only when you look at the big picture. If you look at a single "like" you can't get much out of it, but if you see someone "like" someone else's posts a surprising amount, you can draw some conclusions. For example, if you just see Lewy "like" Emi's post you'll think "well, I guess he liked Emi's post", but when you see that "likes" from Lewy to Emi are by far the single most common "like" vector, you might think something else. Quote
Zalor Posted June 24, 2015 Posted June 24, 2015 "Has anyone, like(interjection), like-like (really like/love) "liked" your post?" "Has anyone "liked" your post because they really like/love you?"  Thanks, this clarification was actually helpful. That's what I thought you were communicating, but I wasn't certain. Quote
Cyrillej1 Posted June 24, 2015 Posted June 24, 2015 Sooo here's my likes data for fun ^^  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I only included people I liked more than 10 times for 2014, 2015, and total.  2014 - Likes Given To  2015 - Likes Given To  2014+2015 - Likes Given To  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I only included people who have liked me more than 5 times.  2014-2015 - Total Likes Received From Flutterz 1 Quote
Flutterz Posted June 24, 2015 Author Posted June 24, 2015 Sooo here's my likes data for fun ^^  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I only included people I liked more than 10 times for 2014, 2015, and total.  2014 - Likes Given To  2015 - Likes Given To  2014+2015 - Likes Given To  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I only included people who have liked me more than 5 times.  2014-2015 - Total Likes Received From Statistically that means that you must have, like, like-like "liked" me, and statistics never lie! (just don't check maefdomn's status) Cyrillej1 1 Quote
Abyssal Monkey Posted June 24, 2015 Posted June 24, 2015 Sooo here's my likes data for fun ^^  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I only included people I liked more than 10 times for 2014, 2015, and total.  2014 - Likes Given To  2015 - Likes Given To  2014+2015 - Likes Given To  ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I only included people who have liked me more than 5 times.  2014-2015 - Total Likes Received From I do believe this is a classic case of the Simpson's Paradox in action is it not? Quote
Cyrillej1 Posted June 24, 2015 Posted June 24, 2015 I do believe this is a classic case of the Simpson's Paradox in action is it not? Actually, I just changed the 2015 one xD.. I forgot to add Stray's vote in 2014 into the total. Quote
Flutterz Posted June 24, 2015 Author Posted June 24, 2015 Actually, I just changed the 2015 one xD.. I forgot to add Stray's vote in 2014 into the total. I was just going to say that you probably need to combine more than 2 sets to get the Simpson's Paradox, guess that explains it. Quote
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.