B0X0R

I'm glad that I'm not the only one who thinks this.

So when J.J. Abrahams makes the movie, who's going to be playing you? What did I do for my waifu? I made a life size cut out of her. Hand traced, hand colored, and hand cut. It was kind of part of a side project that I had while I was in the Anime club office. Took me a month to complete and I almost didn't finish before the semester ended. No one really batted an eye when people saw me carrying her down the halls and taking her home. They've seen me carry around several other cutouts.

Hello surveyor Flame! Welcome.

Wow....just hello? be more unique or creative. And Hi~~~ welcome to fuwa. And nice name remind me of something but i cant really remember what is it. Oh do u prefer Futanari or traps? Too tired. I'll try again. Yay! You made it to fuwa forums! Weee! You did it!

Seems ambitious.

Hello.

Confession: So am I.

Happy new year to you too. Next year, I want to focus on majoring in criminology, and not switch majors again.

Hi

How many years should one wait for this "opportunity" and how does one know that this "opportunity" is available? Does this "opportunity" have a certain smell or flashing lights? Does a choice screen pop up when this "opportunity" arrives? You have friends right? Whenever they ask you to hang out, go hang out. Or if they are the reclusive type, ask them to hang out with you. I did have friends once. I now have a friend. The rest are people. Grab that friend and go out into the world. Go and explore! See what the world is hiding from you two. You give shit advice. That's why it's free.

I would also like to know, for... uhhh... a friend They are quite soft true, they feel like a soft, round, water bed made of flesh that emits warmth. How many years should one wait for this "opportunity" and how does one know that this "opportunity" is available? Does this "opportunity" have a certain smell or flashing lights? Does a choice screen pop up when this "opportunity" arrives? You have friends right? Whenever they ask you to hang out, go hang out. Or if they are the reclusive type, ask them to hang out with you. I did have friends once. I now have a friend. The rest are people. Grab that friend and go out into the world. Go and explore! See what the world is hiding from you two.

How many years should one wait for this "opportunity" and how does one know that this "opportunity" is available? Does this "opportunity" have a certain smell or flashing lights? Does a choice screen pop up when this "opportunity" arrives? You have friends right? Whenever they ask you to hang out, go hang out. Or if they are the reclusive type, ask them to hang out with you.

Ask what they were doing in the box. Ask if they need help. Ask for age.

Yay! New meat! I mean welcome!

Take advantage of opportunity's and just go with the flow. Surprisingly yes. There are woman who can handle the Python. Nope. That's just an urban legend to make you feel better about keeping your V card. In all honesty, don't worry about it. You'll lose it when the time cums. Show more skin. With your hands. Honestly when in the heat of the moment, just go for it, trust me, they won't mind, ( so long as they are into it). Just start calling her your Waifu. Then stand back and watch her transform! Take it as a NOOooo!

Go to a bar. If you specifically look for sex, sex is all you're going to get.

Craigslist. Yeah that's probably you're best bet. Or if you ever find yourself at a furry convention, start making new friends.

In about 12 years. Ten if you know the right people.

Eh, everyone else is doing it. Need advice about your girlfriend? Boyfriend? Friend? 2D Waifu? Ask me and I'll try to give you advice. I'm stuck at an airport so I've got all the time in the world. WARNING! Some of the advise that I give is for fun. Don't actually do some of it. I am not legally responsible!

Welcome!

Do we really need another Q&A topic?

Ditto

you completely ignore everything, including the part where they broke 6 laws in 6 countries. its not called TOS its called -> subscriber agreement <- in legal terms its a binding agreement or contract since you cant unserstand the difference: http://legal-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/Binding+Agreements https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contract Valve is using a 3th party to transfer money, i clearly give you the official link to the FAQ that developers ask about bills: also its not number one in digital retail, thats belongs to Amazon (did steam launch a real live rocket?! NO, also steam did not make billions this year or else the news media will be covering it): http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/blue-origin-amazons-jeff-bezos-successfully-launches-returns/story?id=35389131 i'm not the only one who said its evil, people who work closely and had done business with valve are saying the same thing.

False. I just grab the first shirt and pants in my closet and call it good enough. The next person is about to go to sleep.

Since I'm in the mood for some off-topic, what exactly is wrong with Valve's games? or counter-strike for that matter? By the way Valve didn't even make counter-strike. valves owns counter strike so they should at least be held responsible for it and on steam they are claiming that they made it: http://store.steampowered.com/app/730/ this happen: http://steamed.kotaku.com/valve-admits-controversial-counter-strike-changes-didnt-1748386942 then this: http://steamed.kotaku.com/counter-strike-player-takes-out-four-enemies-with-a-sin-1749343245 and lastly this: http://kotaku.com/counter-strike-champ-makes-cheating-teammates-life-a-li-1728785807 I play counter strike regularly I'm even a somewhat high ranked player(no global elite, but still) so let me give you some food for though. While the Winter(R8) update was controversial, they reverted the changes in 3 days something they never did before, which shows that they did understand the wrong they did with the game, and that they are open to feed back. That scout shot is completely normal, if you actually understand CS you know that a gun with sufficient bullet penetration can hit multiple enemies with 1 shot, in that case it was 4 kills with 1 hit, because they lined up and it was all headshots(on the 3 extra kills), and the first one died because he had no armor, therefore insta-kill as well. You can't blame valve for cheating, there will never exist a perfect anti-cheat system so you should blame the people that do find fun in doing it. Also there are what's called vac waves in which batches of people are vac banned if there was evidence of cheating found by the VAC system, could VAC be better/faster? sure it could but never perfect, at the end of the day the blame is in the mindset of the cheaters. So tell me, what kind of responsibility do you expect about CS from valve then? other than cheating (they could at least update it like every mmo game i know), i do expect valve to at least do something creative with their games. i'm not saying add more maps or change the game that everyone knows, something better like the zombie version of the game and maybe more maps. The zombie version does exist, be it through mods or through that stupid(aka P2W) nexon iteration of the game. Secondly, VAC is updated, but valve unfortunately isn't able to ever pick up on every cheat, specially the private and paid ones. Finally, a bigger map pool in terms of official competitive play isn't really /that/ needed, considering the work you need to learn everything about them it could possible degrade the scene, if you just want a bigger map pool for the average joe, it already exists through the workshop. P.S.- If you say that you're saying that you aren't really implying that they should add more maps don't contradict yourself 18 words later. well the main problem is not the games but valve, people still believe its better to lose game ownership then have the game able to run. p.s someone fix this quote bug Well then Valve isn't really the main evil, any digital distribution platform(be it for games or not) only sells you a license of sorts, therefore you can put companies like Ubisoft, Sony, Microsoft and EA in that mix as well. You can say that it's valve's fault for starting this way of distribution, however it's quite logical in how it would evolve. So while I would like to really own the games I have in my digital libraries, I do understand why I don't. Lastly, if I may ask how do you manage to contradict yourself every other post? if you were complaining about valve's games how can you say that they aren't even really the main problem(as in something that matters overall) anymore? this guy explains it perfectly, he once worked in the IT development and like you also has played games that valve put out: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TaiZKV2Quv0 Hold on! Hold on! Slow down there cowboy. There are way too many redundant premises and one too many conclusions in your logic there. Let's break it down together shall we? First things first, what is your main conclusion? From what I can manage to cobble together, it seems as though your big picture is that we should stop trusting Valve. You then follow up this conclusion with another conclusion about how devs are at risk of exposing their personal information. Now here's the problem: a conclusion is not dependent on another conclusion. Rather then drawing up a new argument, let's just keep things simple and assume that the second conclusion is actually a premise for the first conclusion. Unfortunately we have now run into another problem. The premise of devs exposing their personal information, despite just being turned into a premise, can not stand on its own. Therefore you're going to need a valid premises in oorder for this to work. Let's move on to the next statement. You said that players are unable to fight the Valve agreement. Putting personal opinions aside, this could arguably work as a premis for your conclusion even though I do find it unfair of you to imply that a company should leave themselves legally vulnerable in order to be in good graces with their consumers. It's not Valve that's evil, it's the rulebook of business that's evil. Moving along, you then go on to say that Valve makes bad games... What does that have to do with trusting Valve? I would suggest that you take out this premise for a more effective argument is. Your next premise is stated more as a rhetorical question which seems to be implying that your premise is that all of Valves digital consumers are not the owners of the physical good. While this O statement seems redundant, it actually seems to stand on its own. Good job! You then go into a very in depth description on why Counter Strike sucks. Once again irrelevant so just get rid of it. Also as a side note, given how in depth you went into your gripes with Counter Strike, it seems to me that you simply have a vendetta against Valve, not for the Cache incident, but with CS itself. Ah, you then finnaly provide us some relevant support. Unfortunately there are two problems that have just raised. First, this support doesn't really fit anywhere. You would think that it would go above the Devs at risk but after watching the video myself, putting the support there changes the standpoint of your argument. The fact that in the video, the expert admits that he is unfamiliar with the type of programming that Valve uses to store the cach data makes the validity of almost everything he says afterwords undetermined. Now the only way for the argument to be in the Aristotelian standpoint. This means that your argument is valid only if the support you provided is true. Now then, any questions?